Data:
Nutmeg
Session time | Time at heel | |
---|---|---|
Session 1 | 10 minutes | 1 minute, 32 seconds |
Session 2 | 15 min | 4 min, 51 sec |
Session 3 | 15 min | 7 min, 36 sec |
Session 4 | 15 min | 7 min, 50 sec |
Session 5 | 15 min | 9 min, 43 sec |
Session Time | Time at heel | |
---|---|---|
Session 1 | 10 min | 2 min |
Session 2 | 15 min | 9 min, 46 sec |
Session 3 | 15 min | 7 min, 19 sec |
Session 4 | 15 min | 11 min, 6 sec |
Session 5 | 15 min | 10 min, 10 sec |
Analysis:
After session: | Ratio between times: (Nutmeg/Tess) |
---|---|
1 | 0.765 |
2 | 0.496 |
3 | 1.038 |
4 | 0.705 |
5 | 0.956 |
Conclusion:
My hypothesis was mostly supported. My 12-year-old dog, Nutmeg, did learn more slowly than my 2-year-old dog, but usually by less than a ratio of 1/2 (0.5). Also, for session 3, I trained the dogs on the street instead of in my driveway. In the street, there are more distractions, and it is easier for Nutmeg to ignore these because things aren't as "new" as they are for Tess. In adverse conditions, an older dog may actually have a slight advantage over a younger dog because of life experiences.
Another thing I noticed was that Nutmeg's time at heel increased steadily, while Tess's jumped around. This shows that while older dogs may learn more slowly, they also learn more steadily than younger dogs.
Back to the project